Compare / Claude Opus 4.8 vs grok-4-fast-reasoning

Claude Opus 4.8 vs grok-4-fast-reasoning

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · profile
grok-4-fast-reasoning
xAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.8grok-4-fast-reasoning
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4691,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4901,403
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,383
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5251,421
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4911,389
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4801,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4741,388
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 41.817.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.0%84.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 48.7%19.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 62.2%50.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.7%73.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 58.3%18.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.4%65.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%23.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 65.953.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.