Compare / Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · profile
GLM 5
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.8GLM 5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4691,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4901,451
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5251,481
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4911,446
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4801,457
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4741,447
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 71.9%49.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 50.0%35.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 62.5%31.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 78.8%60.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 83.8%73.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 84.3%47.3%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%34.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 65.955.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.