Compare / claude-opus-4 vs Kimi K2.5
claude-opus-4 vs Kimi K2.5
11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | claude-opus-4 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,409 | 1,441 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,432 | 1,423 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,448 | 1,483 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,444 | 1,439 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,426 | 1,450 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,431 | 1,428 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 6.0% | 10.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 68.2 | 62.4 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 91.0% | 92.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 12.0% | 14.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.