Compare / Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.1

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.1

17 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5GPT-5.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4901,416
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4881,459
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4861,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4721,428
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5431,482
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,450
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4911,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4821,437
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 78.049.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 50.824.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%87.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 54.9%28.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.0%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 89.1%52.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 44.7%15.9%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 59.9%48.0%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $11,181.87$1,473.43

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.