Compare / Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 4.7

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 4.7

16 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic · profile
GLM 4.7
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 5GLM 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4881,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4861,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4721,404
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5431,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4911,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4821,416
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 78.045.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 50.822.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.7%85.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 54.9%27.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.0%71.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 89.1%45.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 44.7%12.2%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 59.9%32.2%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $11,181.87$2,376.82

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.