Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
13 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,449 | 1,371 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,461 | 1,367 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,454 | 1,332 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,498 | 1,401 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,464 | 1,357 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,457 | 1,368 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,454 | 1,343 |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Average% resolved | 53.0% | 32.1% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Front end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved | 36.8% | 25.0% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Greenfield (Commit0)% resolved | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Information gathering (GAIA)% resolved | 72.7% | 32.7% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Issue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved | 74.2% | 56.8% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Testing (SWT-Bench)% resolved | 68.8% | 33.3% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.