Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1

13 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · profile
llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1
NVIDIA · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.5llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4611,342
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4541,331
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4641,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4571,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4541,321
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 95.0%100.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 65.0%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 61.4%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 73.2%10.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 68.8%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 88.7%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 81.1%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 81.0%0.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.