Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

22 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
22
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.4 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4491,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4611,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4541,335
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4981,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4641,387
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4571,401
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4541,362
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 52.156.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 20.720.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 83.4%81.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 17.8%28.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 57.3%75.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.3%76.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 45.7%47.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 55.8%60.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%0.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 35.6%42.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 24.5%27.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 78.1%76.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 30.7%11.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 95.6%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.0%3.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.