Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 Mini

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 Mini

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5 Mini
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5 Mini
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4491,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4611,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4541,324
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4981,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4641,373
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4571,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4541,352
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 95.0%91.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 65.0%44.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 61.4%27.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 73.2%55.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 68.8%93.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 88.7%69.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 81.1%62.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 81.0%82.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 95.6%99.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.0%12.9%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.