Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2
19 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agentsreported | Tasks passed% of tasks | 43.0% | 36.4% |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,461 | 1,484 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,482 | 1,519 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,449 | 1,448 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,506 | 1,502 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,475 | 1,475 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,472 | 1,496 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,455 | 1,472 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 63.0 | 72.2 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 30.1 | 39.6 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 87.5% | 90.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 33.6% | 45.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 80.0% | 79.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 50.1% | 57.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 71.2% | 80.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 3.0% | 7.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 34.4% | 34.8% |
| GDP.pdfreported | Professional document tasks% of rubric | 18.0% | 16.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 35.5% | 60.3% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.