Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs grok-4.20-0309-reasoning

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs grok-4.20-0309-reasoning

11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic · profile
grok-4.20-0309-reasoning
xAI · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.6grok-4.20-0309-reasoning
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 30.125.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 87.5%88.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 33.6%32.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 56.6%82.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 80.0%67.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 53.0%40.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 79.5%96.5%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 35.5%30.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%46.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 64.555.3

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.