Compare / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 61.844.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 57.223.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 28.59.1
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars $571,203$301,289
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $0.42$0.20
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 00
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 52.028.2
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 55.154.0
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent $0.70$0.26
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 56.036.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 55.0%41.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.7%80.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 61.0%51.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 63.6%14.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 46.5%47.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.