Compare / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
47 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.12 | $0.0261 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 37.5% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 557 | 555 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 8.1 s | 0.5 s |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.0080 | $0.0297 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 91.7% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 33 | 529 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 2.1 s | 0.5 s |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 3.0% | 13.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 96.5% | 93.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 0.6% | 10.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 8.9% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 3.97 | 9.12 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 86.3% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 20.8% | 36.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 3.0% | 13.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 99.4% | 95.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 1.2% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 90.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 96.2% | 94.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0172 | $0.0080 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 94.5% | 90.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 91.5% | 91.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.2% | 14.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 35.1% | 15.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 21.4% | 5.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.59 | 3.07 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 51.8% | 75.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 19.1% | 30.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 3.0% | 11.3% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 61.8 | 28.5 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 57.2 | 3.4 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 28.5 | 8.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | $571,203 | −$159,882 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.42 | $0.15 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 0 | 3 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 52.0 | 15.2 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 55.1 | 55.2 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | $0.70 | −$0.17 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.