Compare / DeepSeek V3.1 vs Kimi K2 0711

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Kimi K2 0711

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek · profile
Kimi K2 0711
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.1Kimi K2 0711
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4171,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4021,371
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4321,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4171,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4071,375
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.712.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 77.9%76.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 14.3%7.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 41.5%41.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 56.7%53.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 25.0%15.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 37.4%61.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%22.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.29
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 51.952.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.