Compare / DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Kimi K2 0905

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Kimi K2 0905

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusKimi K2 0905
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4231,404
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4051,382
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4201,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4171,419
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4111,382
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 14.815.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.2%76.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 16.4%6.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 57.0%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 69.3%53.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.8%23.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 37.1%73.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 32.0%22.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.31
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.054.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.