Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1

13 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1
NVIDIA · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2 Expllama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,342
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4091,331
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,321
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 93.2%100.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 54.2%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 44.9%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 56.7%10.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 93.8%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 85.5%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 76.0%0.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 69.5%0.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.