Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-4.1 Nano
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-4.1 Nano
14 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | GPT-4.1 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,422 | 1,321 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,409 | 1,307 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,449 | 1,313 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,416 | 1,300 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,425 | 1,322 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,410 | 1,299 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 93.2% | 83.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 54.2% | 18.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 44.9% | 23.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 56.7% | 33.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 93.8% | 93.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 85.5% | 73.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 76.0% | 60.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 69.5% | 11.0% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.