Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs gpt-oss-20b

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs gpt-oss-20b

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
gpt-oss-20b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2 Expgpt-oss-20b
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4091,240
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4491,314
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,281
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,318
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,275
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 16.610.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.7%68.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 14.9%11.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.1%65.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.3%34.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%10.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 33.9%60.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 25.0%98.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.31
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.024.6

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.