Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning

20 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
xAI · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2 Expgrok-4-1-fast-reasoning
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4461,413
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4091,414
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4491,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,401
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,407
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 93.2%79.4%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 54.2%54.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 44.9%58.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 56.7%69.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 93.8%81.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 85.5%88.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 76.0%78.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 69.5%82.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 25.0%7.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.051.3
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 96.6%99.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 5.3%19.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.