Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 4.6V

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 4.6V

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
GLM 4.6V
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 4.6V
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4461,392
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,370
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4091,350
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4491,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,367
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,379
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,357
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 16.611.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.7%71.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 14.9%9.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.1%30.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.3%48.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%14.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 33.9%31.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 25.0%35.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.039.7

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.