Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M2.5

DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M2.5

18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek · profile
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2MiniMax M2.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4371,386
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4231,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4001,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4531,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4201,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,369
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 45.7%45.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 27.9%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 25.0%12.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 50.3%47.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 71.6%72.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 53.6%68.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 26.0%41.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 57.341.7
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 92.6%98.2%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 6.3%9.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.