Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.5
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.5
18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | DeepSeek V3.2 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,437 | 1,445 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,423 | 1,441 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,400 | 1,423 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,453 | 1,483 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,420 | 1,439 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,425 | 1,450 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,410 | 1,428 |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Average% resolved | 45.7% | 49.2% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Front end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved | 27.9% | 32.8% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Greenfield (Commit0)% resolved | 25.0% | 18.8% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Information gathering (GAIA)% resolved | 50.3% | 63.6% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Issue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved | 71.6% | 68.8% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Testing (SWT-Bench)% resolved | 53.6% | 61.9% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 26.0% | 10.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 57.3 | 62.4 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 92.6% | 92.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 6.3% | 14.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.