Compare / Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 3 12B
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 3 12B
16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,399 | 1,386 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,394 | 1,332 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,424 | 1,274 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,400 | 1,321 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,409 | 1,342 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,402 | 1,313 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 93.7% | 70.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 41.3% | 27.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 36.2% | 5.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 56.2% | 30.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 75.0% | 93.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 88.1% | 79.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 78.2% | 74.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 62.0% | 4.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.0% | 97.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 7.8% | 4.4% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.