Compare / Gemini 2.5 Flash vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
xAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricGemini 2.5 Flashgrok-4-1-fast-reasoning
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4371,413
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3991,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3941,414
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4241,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4001,401
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4091,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4021,407
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 93.7%79.4%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 41.3%54.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 36.2%58.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 56.2%69.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 75.0%81.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 88.1%88.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 78.2%78.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 62.0%82.5%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.0%99.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 7.8%19.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.