Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Spark 1.2

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Spark 1.2

23 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google · profile
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
Results compared
23
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 35.3%36.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.08-0.05
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.01-0.12
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.04-0.05
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4721,484
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4771,519
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4801,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5091,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4791,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4871,496
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4801,472
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 68.872.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.739.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 94.1%90.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 47.0%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.0%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 58.7%57.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 73.8%80.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 4.0%7.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 21.4%34.8%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 17.0%16.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 73.5%60.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.