Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4 Nano
14 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.0446 | $0.0050 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 58.3% | 66.7% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 529 | 33 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 3.1 s | 1.1 s |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,472 | 1,418 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,477 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,480 | 1,335 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,509 | 1,438 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,479 | 1,387 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,487 | 1,401 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,480 | 1,362 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.4% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.4% | 3.1% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.