Compare / Gemini 3.5 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b

24 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google · profile
gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
24
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricGemini 3.5 Flashgpt-oss-120b
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 27.5%4.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4761,385
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4681,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4661,277
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4911,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4651,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4771,352
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4721,309
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 70.130.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 33.611.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.2%78.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.7%19.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 76.3%69.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 74.3%52.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 53.9%34.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 78.7%26.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 6.6%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 46.2%23.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 32.2%12.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 95.6%65.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 9.0%107.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.29
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 72.538.5
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,396.42$-21.53

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.