Compare / gemini-3-flash vs GLM 5.1

gemini-3-flash vs GLM 5.1

21 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

gemini-3-flash
Google · profile
GLM 5.1
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
21
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricgemini-3-flashGLM 5.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4681,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4691,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4571,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4961,495
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4581,460
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4731,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4611,453
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 26.326.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.8%86.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 36.6%30.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 78.0%76.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%73.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 38.6%43.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 20.8%13.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 80.4%97.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 49.0%58.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 22.1%41.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 18.8%37.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 58.8%67.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.6%75.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 70.7%70.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.