Compare / gemini-3-pro-preview vs GLM 4.6

gemini-3-pro-preview vs GLM 4.6

13 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

gemini-3-pro-preview
Google · profile
GLM 4.6
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricgemini-3-pro-previewGLM 4.6
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 85.6%85.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 61.7%55.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 63.1%68.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 72.5%72.4%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 75.0%75.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 90.7%87.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 83.1%80.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 80.0%77.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 33.0%13.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 66.753.3
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.4%94.5%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 13.6%9.5%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.