Compare / Gemma 3 4B vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
Gemma 3 4B vs grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
19 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemma 3 4B | grok-4-1-fast-reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,330 | 1,417 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,274 | 1,414 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,260 | 1,438 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,267 | 1,401 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,303 | 1,430 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,298 | 1,407 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 53.9% | 79.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 8.6% | 54.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 0.4% | 58.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 19.6% | 69.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 100.0% | 81.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 61.1% | 88.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 60.8% | 78.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 1.0% | 82.5% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 9.0% | 7.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 24.0 | 51.3 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 67.3% | 99.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 6.4% | 19.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.