Compare / Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Phi 4

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Phi 4

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Meta · profile
Phi 4
Microsoft · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 1B InstructPhi 4
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,0701,256
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,0831,210
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,0821,268
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,0861,245
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1111,256
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,0761,229
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 51.6%87.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 3.2%24.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 0.0%3.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 10.8%28.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 43.8%50.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 38.4%69.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 11.8%60.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 0.0%4.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 22.0%19.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.34
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 11.825.7

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.