Compare / Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM 5.1
Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM 5.1
18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,463 | 1,456 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,493 | 1,465 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,449 | 1,448 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,504 | 1,495 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,473 | 1,460 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,491 | 1,465 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,460 | 1,453 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 71.3 | 55.8 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 33.7 | 26.1 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 89.8% | 86.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 46.2% | 30.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 77.7% | 73.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 58.8% | 44.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 77.9% | 61.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 6.1% | 2.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 31.8% | 13.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 57.8% | 34.0% |
| Vending-Bench 2reported | Money after a yearUS dollars | $6,520.48 | $5,634.41 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.