Compare / Muse Spark 1.2 vs gpt-oss-120b

Muse Spark 1.2 vs gpt-oss-120b

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricMuse Spark 1.2gpt-oss-120b
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 36.4%4.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4841,385
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5191,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4481,277
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5021,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4751,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4961,352
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4721,309
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 72.230.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 39.611.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 90.4%78.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 45.5%19.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%52.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 57.4%34.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 80.2%26.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 7.1%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.8%12.8%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.