Compare / Muse Spark 1.2 vs GLM 5.2

Muse Spark 1.2 vs GLM 5.2

21 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
21
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricMuse Spark 1.2GLM 5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.050.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.120.10
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.050.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4841,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5191,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4481,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5021,500
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4751,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4961,476
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4721,459
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 72.268.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 39.633.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 90.4%89.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 45.5%41.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 57.4%51.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 80.2%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 7.1%1.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 34.8%34.6%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 60.3%34.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.