Compare / Muse Spark 1.3 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

53 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · profile
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral · profile
Results compared
53
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricMuse Spark 1.3Mistral Medium 3.5
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0142$0.0354
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 91.7%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.0%0.4%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 33572
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 4.2 s0.5 s
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.0%3.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 98.2%94.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 5.4%10.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 38.7%11.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 19.6%7.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 1.364.45
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 51.2%83.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 14.3%36.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 3.6%13.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 100.0%90.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 97.8%94.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0164$0.0080
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 97.7%92.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 92.9%91.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 0.7%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 6.0%14.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 66.1%29.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 46.4%19.6%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 13.1%51.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 0.381.76
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 16.7%30.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 4.2%11.3%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 51.628.5
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 25.83.4
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 26.78.7
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars $337,251−$159,882
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $0.18$0.15
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 03
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 34.115.2
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.855.2
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent $0.29−$0.17
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.08-0.16
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.04-0.15
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.02-0.07
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.00-0.02
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4791,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5061,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4501,398
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5271,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4861,421
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4941,426
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4661,404

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.