Compare / Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

22 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · profile
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
22
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricMuse Spark 1.3GLM 5.3 Flash
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 57.8%52.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.080.07
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.04-0.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.02-0.01
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4791,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5061,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4501,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5271,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4861,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4941,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4661,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 76.571.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 48.141.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 94.1%91.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 48.7%39.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 83.0%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 59.7%51.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 85.4%84.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 33.3%32.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 50.5%47.2%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 27.6%14.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.