Compare / Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs GLM 4.6

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs GLM 4.6

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Ministral 3 14B 2512
Mistral · profile
GLM 4.6
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricMinistral 3 14B 2512GLM 4.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 14.445.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 6.0018.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 57.2%78.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.6%14.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 32.0%43.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 26.3%54.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 9.7%49.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 4.5%28.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 6.6%13.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 27.2%76.9%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 24.0%13.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.320.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 31.453.3
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.6%94.5%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 19.4%9.5%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.