Compare / Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs gpt-oss-120b
Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs gpt-oss-120b
17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Ministral 3 8B 2512 | gpt-oss-120b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 9.70 | 30.4 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 5.50 | 11.6 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 47.1% | 78.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 4.3% | 19.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 29.1% | 69.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 25.7% | 52.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 20.7% | 34.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 4.1% | 26.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 4.5% | 23.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 3.7% | 12.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 26.6% | 65.8% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 23.0% | 107.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 28.8 | 38.5 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.1% | 99.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 21.7% | 14.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.