Compare / Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs GLM 4.7

Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs GLM 4.7

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Ministral 3 8B 2512
Mistral · profile
GLM 4.7
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricMinistral 3 8B 2512GLM 4.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 9.7045.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 5.5022.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 47.1%85.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.3%27.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 29.1%67.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 25.7%71.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 4.1%45.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 4.5%31.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 3.7%12.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 26.6%95.9%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 23.0%28.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 28.847.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.1%99.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 21.7%11.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.