Compare / Mistral Large 4 vs Kimi K3
Mistral Large 4 vs Kimi K3
55 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Mistral Large 4 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 95.9% | 96.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 10.7% | 14.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 80.4% | 81.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 3.69 | 3.64 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 17.3% | 20.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 100.0% | 99.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 3.0% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 97.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 96.5% | 96.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0033 | $0.0469 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 93.1% | 96.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 94.4% | 94.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 3.5% | 5.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 39.9% | 61.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 10.7% | 41.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 0.91 | 0.98 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 33.3% | 16.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 19.6% | 24.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.2% | 3.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Accurate decks% of tasks | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Caveat dropped% of tasks | 16.7% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Clean layout% of tasks | 33.3% | 33.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Cost per deckUS dollars | $0.0148 | $0.45 |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Deck ratingrating | 515 | 1,255 |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Design quality% of the maximum | 30.5% | 81.4% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Draft figure quoted% of tasks | 16.7% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Findings missing% of tasks | 0.0% | 16.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Head-to-head win rate% of comparisons | 10.7% | 74.2% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Layout defects% of tasks | 66.7% | 66.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Misleading metric used% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Presentable decks% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Recommendation late or wrong% of tasks | 83.3% | 33.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Slides needing work% of tasks | 100.0% | 16.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of tasks | 50.0% | 33.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported numbers% of tasks | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 55.8 | 65.1 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 34.2 | 40.2 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 16.7 | 28.3 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | $533,401 | $654,270 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.0657 | $1.01 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 37.0 | 44.1 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 55.0 | 54.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | $0.45 | $0.50 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.