Compare / Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol

53 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral · profile
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
53
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricMistral Medium 3.5GPT-6 Sol
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0354$0.0297
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 0.0%50.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.4%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 572445
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 0.5 s1.6 s
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 13.1%0.6%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 93.7%97.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 10.1%7.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 0.0%67.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 0.0%55.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 9.120.36
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 100.0%11.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 36.3%13.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 13.1%3.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 95.8%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 4.2%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 90.9%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 94.5%97.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0080$0.0085
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 90.5%97.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 91.7%93.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 0.0%1.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 14.3%7.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 15.5%70.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 5.4%60.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 3.070.24
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 75.6%7.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 30.9%14.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 11.3%3.6%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 28.569.4
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 3.452.9
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 8.742.9
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars −$159,882$600,357
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $0.15$0.24
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 30
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 15.254.1
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 55.254.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent −$0.17$0.65
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.160.11
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.150.11
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.070.15
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.020.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4301,424
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4301,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3981,451
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4341,507
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4211,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4261,457
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4041,440

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.