Compare / Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
22 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Kimi K2.6 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,456 | 1,418 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,455 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,433 | 1,335 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,503 | 1,438 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,456 | 1,387 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,461 | 1,401 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,441 | 1,362 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 61.8 | 56.1 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 27.0 | 20.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 91.1% | 81.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 37.5% | 28.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 76.0% | 75.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 81.0% | 76.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 51.5% | 47.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 65.9% | 60.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 43.9% | 42.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 23.3% | 27.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 95.9% | 76.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 34.9% | 11.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.7% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.8% | 3.1% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.