Compare / Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 4.7

Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 4.7

18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · profile
GLM 4.7
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricKimi K2.6GLM 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4561,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4551,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4331,404
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5031,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4561,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4611,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4411,416
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 57.1%42.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 41.2%22.1%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 25.0%12.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 74.5%53.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.6%73.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 70.4%49.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 18.0%28.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 64.447.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.7%99.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.8%11.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.