Compare / Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM 5.2

Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM 5.2

14 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI · profile
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
14
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricKimi K2.7 CodeGLM 5.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 60.868.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 25.833.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%89.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 35.0%41.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 63.1%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.3%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 47.8%51.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 67.4%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.0%1.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 44.7%50.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 20.2%34.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 90.1%99.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 36.5%34.2%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,082.94$8,313.78

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.