Compare / Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM 5.3

Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM 5.3

12 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI · profile
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricKimi K2.7 CodeGLM 5.3
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 37.6%56.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 60.874.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 25.844.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%91.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 35.0%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.3%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 47.8%59.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 67.4%83.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.0%41.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 20.2%50.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 36.5%41.0%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $5,082.94$8,163.61

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.