Compare / Kimi K2 0711 vs GPT-5 Nano

Kimi K2 0711 vs GPT-5 Nano

21 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Kimi K2 0711
Moonshot AI · profile
GPT-5 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
21
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricKimi K2 0711GPT-5 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4091,339
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3711,247
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4171,354
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3811,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4181,338
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3751,289
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 12.713.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 76.6%67.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 7.4%9.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 41.5%67.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 53.0%45.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 15.9%17.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 61.1%36.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 87.3%89.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 29.0%24.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 50.6%34.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 59.1%51.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 75.0%93.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 81.6%80.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 78.7%70.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 66.5%72.5%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.