Compare / Kimi K3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Kimi K3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

22 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · profile
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
22
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricKimi K3GLM 5.3 Flash
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 50.6%52.8%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.090.07
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.07-0.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.01-0.01
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4721,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4891,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4581,433
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5331,510
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4861,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4881,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4751,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 76.271.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 43.641.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 93.5%91.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 46.9%39.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 88.7%80.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 59.5%51.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 85.0%84.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 12.6%32.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 46.0%47.2%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 19.0%14.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.