Compare / GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | GPT-4.1 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,415 | 1,321 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,402 | 1,307 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,405 | 1,313 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,403 | 1,300 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,415 | 1,322 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,405 | 1,299 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 86.5% | 83.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 23.9% | 18.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 38.9% | 23.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 54.0% | 33.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 100.0% | 93.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 88.7% | 73.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 78.9% | 60.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 68.0% | 11.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 31.1% | 6.0% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.