Compare / GPT-5.4 Nano vs grok-4-fast-reasoning
GPT-5.4 Nano vs grok-4-fast-reasoning
16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | grok-4-fast-reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,418 | 1,417 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,405 | 1,403 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,335 | 1,383 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,438 | 1,421 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,387 | 1,389 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,401 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,362 | 1,388 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 20.7 | 17.9 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 81.7% | 84.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 28.3% | 19.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 75.9% | 50.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 76.7% | 73.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 42.4% | 18.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 76.0% | 65.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 3.1% | 20.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.