Compare / GPT-5 Nano vs gpt-oss-120b
GPT-5 Nano vs gpt-oss-120b
15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | GPT-5 Nano | gpt-oss-120b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,339 | 1,351 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,247 | 1,277 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,354 | 1,357 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,327 | 1,323 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,338 | 1,352 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,289 | 1,309 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 13.0 | 11.6 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 67.6% | 78.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 9.5% | 19.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 67.6% | 69.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 45.0% | 52.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 17.4% | 23.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 36.5% | 65.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 100.0% | 99.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.5% | 14.2% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.